Moon dust is less harmful to lungs than earth pollution

As NASA prepares for a long-term lunar mission, researchers are unearthing an often overlooked danger: the fine, fixed lunar dust covering the moon’s surface.

A new study found that the dust, while annoying, is much less toxic to human lung cells than the common air pollution on Earth. It was welcome news for astronauts, eyes returning to lunar life, while missionary planners tried to ensure they were safe.

Comparison of lunar dust with urban earth dust

Researchers at the University of Technology Sydney exposed two types of human lung cells (one from the upper respiratory tract and the other from the deeper alveolar region) that are lunar dust mimics and particulate matter collected from urban air. What are their goals? See which dust is worse for your lungs.

Lead author Michaela B. Smith explains the logic of the study. “Any dust, if you inhale, you sneeze, cough and have some physical irritation. But it’s not as toxic as silicon dioxide, where you end up on the construction site for 10 years,” she said.

Key points of research

• Compared to lunar dust simulators, dust causes more cell death and inflammation.
• Unlike typical air pollution, lunar dust does not trigger oxidative stress in lung cells.
• Particle size is important: the damage caused by dust ≤2.5µm is greater than that of coarser dust.
• The responses of bronchial and alveolar cells differ, showing regional lung sensitivity.

What makes the moon dust different?

The real lunar dust is sharp, irregular and static charge, which means it clings to the suit and gears. After the Apollo mission, astronauts reported breathing problems after re-entering their lunar modules, where dust had become airborne. But the new study shows that its threat lies more in the body’s stimulation than chemical toxicity.

Crucially, Moon Dust does not activate markers of oxidative stress, such as the SOD2 gene in lung cells, and lung contamination usually occurs. This suggests that the lunar dust lacks reactive particles (such as nanophase or combustion by-products) that make urban air so destructive.

One size does not fit all: How cells respond

Not all lung cells respond the same. In this study, bronchial cells (BEAS-2B) showed mild inflammation and viability of high dust doses, while alveolar cells (A549) had higher overall resistance. Interestingly, post-processed monsoon dust containing smaller particles is more harmful to alveolar cells, especially when the iron oxide content is higher.

Here is a noteworthy detail: LMS-1 dust (more rich in iron oxide) is more toxic to A549 cells, while LHS-1 is higher in silicon dioxide and has a greater impact on Beas-2b cells. This cell-specific response can help guide future safety standards to achieve astronaut exposure.

Engineering solutions conform to biological data

Even if the lunar dust is not highly toxic, NASA will not take risks. Now, the new Rovers design puts the dusty spacesuit entirely outside the cabin.

“Astronauts will be in and out of the interior, and this outfit will never come in, preventing dusty suits from contaminating the interior cabin environment,” Smith said.

The team stressed that while lunar dust is not benign, its health effects at the level of reality exposure can be milder — more annoying than long-term threats.

Looking forward: From Dust to Gravity

Smith’s next focus? How microgravity affects lung function. Using laboratory equipment that simulates weightlessness, she is studying how the lungs adapt or are not adapted in space.

“This fundamental work on lunar dust provides greater confidence for the next huge leap for humanity,” said co-author Brian Oliver. “The results help with a safe case of returning humanity to the moon.”

Subscribe to our newsletter on Alternative

Related