So, I believe I’ve been shutting up for a long enough time. Maybe it’s too long.
As you may be very clear, the CEO (CEO) has regained coal. Apparently, the plan is to increase domestic coal-fired activities – which means coal work, coal production, coal transportation and combustion are all enhanced.
Actually, I was watching TV a few days ago, and the news of this effect was shared with the audience and the audience. Meanwhile, in the scene displayed on the screen, President Trump issued a statement on the center stage, which looked like his back and sides. Which audience? Everyone except the coal miners seemed very satisfied with the speech of the CEO of this country.
Furthermore, I think it seems rush to improve coal more to: My question is: Will miner safety be compromised as a result? Unfortunately, at this point, there is no way to know. All I can say and hope is that all safeguards are taken in all relevant circumstances to ensure my integrity and the safety of the workers.
That is to say, it cannot be denied that the increase in the burning of this dirty natural resource will certainly have a negative impact on more lives. Reality? It is undeniable.
Back in my past, I remember my mom would take me to visit a friend’s family’s home and sit a distance, but a friend close to the rails, close to a train full of hopper cars, each filled with anthracite or asphalt coal that would roll in my friend’s family’s residence.
At some point, I must have commented on the benefits of living next to the railway and being able to capture a lot of track activities. I remember my mom’s response was to make everything my friend’s family could do to keep the coal piled up outside, without a doubt, land, settle down and accumulate on indoor and external surfaces, for example, for example, windowsills. My mom basically hints: “No, thank you!” So, there is.
Another part of the story is the actual burning of natural resources. Remember: When coal burns, it doesn’t burn completely. And, what wasn’t burned obviously turned into coal ash – a by-product. Actually, dirty by-products. My question about this approach is: That deal with? In all or most of the time, in an environmentally responsible way, or not in some way at all, or not doing so at all? At this point, no more information was obtained, and it was an open-ended question.
And, in connection with this, the coal burning process is part of carbon dioxide capture and storage and mitigation of pollutants. If so, where and how will this aspect work?
By the way, I hope the answers will come.
Above and corresponding, connected home page features image: Alan Kandel. (In the future, like the coal train in the photo, tow a long hopper car on the top, seeing through Pando, Colorado, is expected to become a regular fixture again).
– Alan Kandel
Copyright protected material.
