New research shows that converting Colombian rainforests into cattle ranches can cause greater damage to biodiversity than previously thought. Posted in Natural Ecology and Evolution It was found that conventional local-scale surveys significantly underestimated the harm, with an average increase of 60% in biodiversity losses at country-scale. Using sound recordings of nearly 1,000 bird species in Colombia, researchers uncover the real cost of land use changes in one of the world’s most biodiversity countries.
Why local view misses a bigger picture
For decades, scientists have relied on small-scale biodiversity surveys to assess the impact of deforestation. But new research led by David Edwards of the University of Cambridge warns that this approach cannot capture the wider collapse of the ecosystem. Through surveys of birds in 13 different ecological regions over seven years, the team found that even if they survive locally, certain forest-dependent species disappeared completely at the regional level.
“When we looked at the biodiversity impacts of deforestation across Columbia, we found 62% higher losses than local survey results showed,” Edwards said in the study. The researchers believe that regional studies are crucial to avoid underestimating ecological losses from forest transformation.
Birdsong as a window for biodiversity loss
The team not only relied on visual identity but recorded Birdsong at nearly 850 locations in forest and cattle ranches. In 80% of cases, species were identified by sound alone. This allows researchers to detect a wider range of species, including rare or elusive ones.
Major findings from the study
- Bird diversity decreased by 67% when comparing national forests and pastures.
- At least six different ecological regions must be studied to capture the intact biodiversity impact.
- The ranch supports narrower, more uniform species, resulting in ecological homogenization.
- Altitude and regional change issues: Lowland rainforests are the most significant losses.
Impact on biodiversity offset and conservation
Conservation strategies such as biodiversity, such as offsetting, often believe that losses in one region can be compensated by gains in other places. This study challenged this idea. Since bird communities vary by region, species lost in one ecological region cannot be balanced by protecting another.
“The environmental cost of the food we eat is much higher than we thought,” Edwards added, emphasizing the hidden ecological prices of beef and other agricultural products.
Call for broader, smarter surveillance
This study provides a new framework for assessing land use impacts by taking into account ecological changes in large geographic regions. It also underscores the importance of integrating spatial structure into conservation policies.
The study also found that in forest ecosystems, bird communities vary greatly with altitude, a complexity flattened in pastures. This loss of mutation further accelerates biohomogeneity, a process that reduces the elasticity of ecosystems to climate change.
As policymakers and land use planners want to balance development and conservation, the study conveys a clear message: Size is important. Conserving biodiversity in tropical areas requires thinking beyond local areas to embrace the complexity of nature’s patchwork.
Read the full study here
Related
If our report has been informed or inspired, please consider donating. No matter how big or small, every contribution allows us to continue to provide accurate, engaging and trustworthy scientific and medical news. Independent journalism takes time, energy, and resources – your support ensures that we can continue to reveal the stories that matter most to you.
Join us to make knowledge accessible and impactful. Thank you for standing with us!
