Your bank account may not only affect your lifestyle, but may also change the rate at which your body ages at the cellular level.
A pioneering study published in natural medicine shows that people with higher incomes, better education and more favorable social conditions have fewer signs of biological aging than peers of the same age.
The study, led by scientists at University College London (UCL), provides some of the strongest evidence that social inequality has so far-reachingly impacted aging itself (not just the risk of disease), which may have far-reaching implications for how we understand health hazards.
“This study provides strong biological evidence that social conditions can affect the speed of aging,” said Professor Mika Kivimaki, principal author of the UCL School of Brain Sciences. “For decades, we have known that social advantages are related to improving health, but our findings suggest that it may also slow down the aging process itself.”
The comprehensive survey analyzed data from 800,000 participants in four major long-term studies: the Whitehall II study in the UK and the UK biobank, the Finnish public sector study, and the atherosclerosis study headquartered in the US community.
By tracking early life factors such as education and the socio-economic status of fathers and adult metrics such as neighborhood conditions and income, researchers have discovered amazing patterns of how social advantages have affected health outcomes over decades.
Perhaps most revealing is the analysis of blood samples, which suggests that socially disadvantaged individuals have higher levels of proteins associated with the aging process, especially those associated with inflammation and immune system function.
These biological differences translate into major health differences. When the researchers examined 66 age-related diseases, they found that socioeconomic status had a profound impact on disease risk. On average, people with lower socioeconomic status are at a 20% higher risk of these diseases.
For certain diseases, including type 2 diabetes, liver disease, heart disease, lung cancer and stroke – the risk for the most vulnerable is more than doubled compared to the most dominant population.
The timing gap is equally striking. After 15 years of follow-up, those with lower socioeconomic status suffer from the same age-related disease as their disease is superior to their disease after 20 years (effectively allowing them to age faster for five years).
“Our research emphasizes that healthy aging is an achievable goal for the entire society, as it is already a favorable socio-economic situation for people’s reality.”
What is particularly powerful about this study is its comprehensive approach. Instead of focusing on a single measure or outcome, the team studied multiple indicators of aging in different populations and consistently found the same relationship between social advantage and biological aging.
The researchers identified 14 specific proteins in the blood that seem to link social conditions to aging. These proteins regulate inflammatory responses and cellular stress (a bond process in aging) and may account for 39% of the risk of disease in socioeconomic dominant populations.
“Aging is reflected in the composition of proteins in our blood, including thousands of circulating proteins associated with multi-organ systems aging processes across multiple organs,” explains Professor Tony Wyss-Coray of Stanford University. “These biomarkers are indicators of health that allow us to assess how social differences determine the rate of aging.”
The findings also show that improving the social environment can have measurable biological benefits. People who started with low education but achieved better social status later in life had better protein concentrations than those who did not improve.
While the study shows a clear relationship between social advantages and aging, the researchers point out that more work is needed to understand exactly how social factors affect the biological aging process.
“While our research does not tell us why social advantages slow the aging process, other studies show that it may be related to life stress, mental health, exposure to contamination or toxins, as well as smoking, drugs and alcohol, diet and diet, diet and exercise, as well as access to medical screening, examinations, vaccination and medications,” CO-AgriDe Agriff ucl a from ucl damea lind trinda co-age Agnage dameaga a forthiges Agnift of auth partrtttrind said,
The study is based on another recent study by the same team that found that blood tests that measure organ aging can predict age-related disease risk decades ahead of time, potentially providing new avenues for preventive care.
Professor Kivimaki added: “Blood testing is able to grasp the signs of accelerated aging, which can help us determine who might benefit from targeted interventions to improve their health.”
As societies face inequality and aging populations simultaneously on a global scale, these findings highlight the true interconnection of social and biological processes. They suggest addressing social disadvantage is more than just fairness, it may be one of the most effective anti-aging interventions available.
If you find this piece useful, consider supporting our work with a one-time or monthly donation. Your contribution allows us to continue to bring you accurate, thought-provoking scientific and medical news that you can trust. Independent reporting requires time, effort, and resources, and your support makes it possible for us to continue exploring stories that are important to you. Together, we can ensure that important discoveries and developments attract those who need them the most.
